3. Ceasefire Commentary
In an editorial in the Times of India, V.P. Malik, a former Chief of the Indian Army Staff, argues that the ceasefire is part of a long-term strategy to resume the India-Pakistan dialogue, but that Pakistan's sincerity and its support for violence must be evaluated. Malik argues that Pakistan and militant groups underestimate India's political and economic strengths, and therefore put weight on individual tactics of violence rather than their long-term interests.
"India's Initiative"
Indian Home Minister LK Advani stated that India was prepared to hold talks with militant groups to bring peace to Kashmir. Advani stated that talks could cover any issues, "except on the matter of nationality and sovereignty."
"Centre ready for talks with ultras: Advani"
Former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto stated that she supported India's initiatives for encouraging a peace dialogue between India and Pakistan.
"Bhutto hails India's role in peace process"
Amitabh Mattoo, Director of the National Security Program at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi, writes in The Hindu that the relief felt at the extension of the ceasefire is being overwhelmed by the reality that real peace will be elusive for some time. Mattoo states that the ceasefire has led to tangible gains, including a reduction in the harassment of civilians and an increased ability to identify and isolate those groups that perpetuate violence. He argues that despite the failure of the All-Parties Hurriyat Conference to respond meaningfully to the ceasefire, India needs to implement policies that recognize and promote the gains made by the ceasefire.
"Salvaging the peace process in Kashmir"