[Cankor] Report #229
cankor at cankor.ca
cankor at cankor.ca
Sun Dec 11 17:12:41 CST 2005
Dear subscriber,
Welcome to issue #229 of the CanKor Report.
For articles not original to CanKor, direct links are available in the
Contents section, should you wish to consult the originals on the internet.
If the links no longer function, you may refer to the full text articles
appended to the issue.
For back issues, archives and other content, please visit our website:
http://www.cankor.ca
The CanKor team
*************************************************
CANADA-KOREA ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SERVICE
CanKor # 229
Thursday, 8 December 2005
*************************************************
Unresolved US-DPRK bilateral issues once again delay the resumption of
Six-Party Talks. This week's CanKor FOCUS examines the latest acrimony
surrounding sanctions and counterfeit US dollars. Already last October,
Washington imposed sanctions on eight North Korean companies it called
fronts for the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The US Treasury
Department also imposed sanctions on the Banco Delta Asia in Macao for its
role in North Korean counterfeiting of "superdollars" and money laundering.
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says that hoped-for bilateral US-DPRK
talks are unnecessary. The DPRK denies the charges, accusing the USA of
sabotaging the talks and reneging on promises. South Korea continues to
encourage the two parties to hold direct talks in order to prevent
outstanding non-nuclear issues from interfering with the Six-Party Talks.
These include DPRK missiles, biochemical and conventional weapons, human
rights abuses, alleged involvement in drug trafficking and counterfeiting.
US Ambassador to RO Korea Alexander Vershbow responds the following day by
calling the DPRK government a "criminal regime".
President of the Presidium of the DPRK Supreme People's Assembly, Kim Yong
Nam, on 7 December receives credentials from Canadian Ambassador to the DPRK
Marius Grinius.
The ROK worries about how to pay for the planned termination of the KEDO
light-water reactor construction project in the DPRK. Japan and the USA have
avoided answering questions as to who should pay for the estimated $200
million price tag. South Korea is already committed to providing electricity
to the North in return for ending the reactor project.
US AID cancels a pledged shipment of 25,000 tons of food aid to the DPRK,
citing monitoring concerns if the WFP is forced to close operations.
Nicholas Eberstadt adds his own take to last issue's QUIDNUNC answer
regarding the size of the DPR Korean People's Army.
*************************************************
Contents:
1. KIM YONG NAM RECEIVES CREDENTIALS FROM CANADIAN ENVOY
http://www.kcna.co.jp/calendar-e/frame.htm
2. NATIONS DIFFER ON PAYING FOR KEDO DEMISE
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/200512/01/200512012149449479900090309031.html
3. USA CANCELS FOOD AID TO DPRK
http://washingtontimes.com/world/20051202-101224-4376r.htm
FOCUS: Counterfeits and sanctions stall six-party talks
4. STOP COUNTERFEITING OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY: RICE
http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2005/57414.htm
5. US PERFIDY UNDER FIRE
http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-e.htm
6. DPRK ACCUSED OF COUNTERFEITING US CURRENCY
http://www.washtimes.com/world/20051201-103509-5867r.htm
7. ROK CALLS FOR DIRECT US-DPRK TALKS
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-12/05/content_500548.htm
8. US ENVOY CALLS PYONGYANG A 'CRIMINAL REGIME'
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200512/200512070016.html
QUIDNUNC: Readers ask and respond to common and uncommon questions
*************************************************
1. KIM YONG NAM RECEIVES CREDENTIALS FROM CANADIAN ENVOY
Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), Pyongyang, 7 December 2005
Kim Yong Nam, president of the Presidium of the DPRK Supreme People's
Assembly, received credentials from Canadian Ambassador to the DPRK Marius
Grinius at the Mansudae Assembly Hall on 7 December. On hand were Kim Hyong
Jun, vice-minister of Foreign Affairs, and staff members of the Canadian
embassy.
After receiving credentials Kim Yong Nam had a conversation with the
ambassador.
*************************************************
2. NATIONS DIFFER ON PAYING FOR KEDO DEMISE
by Chae Byung-gun and Ser Myo-ja, Joongang Ilbo, 2 December 2005
South Korea is struggling with Japan and the United States over how to
settle issues associated with the planned termination of the light-water
reactor construction project in North Korea, and it is a money matter, South
Korean officials said yesterday. The executive board of the Korean Peninsula
Energy Development Organization, an international consortium formed in 1995
for the project, agreed in principle on the termination last month, but the
three countries differ on details of how to end the project.
According to participants in the talks, South Korea wants to set up a
termination framework to specifically address financial and legal issues.
The United States and Japan, however, contend that the project's termination
should be announced first and follow-up procedures discussed later. Since
the consortium had agreed to decide the fate of the reactor project before
the end of November, Washington and Tokyo claim the announcement of
termination should be made immediately.
The three countries are mainly struggling over how to share the termination
expense. Of the $4.6 billion required to build two reactors in the North,
the consortium decided in 1998 that South Korea would pay 70 percent and
Japan provide 22 percent. The United States agreed to provide heavy fuel aid
to the North until the reactors were completed and to initiate fundraising
for the remaining 8 percent.
"The United States and Japan did not say they will not pay for the
termination expenses, but they also did not say they will pay for it," a
Unification Ministry official said.
Seoul is apparently concerned it will have to pay a large portion of the
cost, since KEDO's main contractor is the Korea Electricity Power
Corporation. The state-run corporation formed 114 sub-contracts with 60
companies at home and abroad, including Hyundai, Daewoo, Westinghouse and
Mitsubishi.
The estimated termination cost will be up to $200 million, a Unification
Ministry official said. That expense will include compensation to
subcontractors for broken deals. Construction has been suspended since
November 2003, and equipment at the Sinpo site in the North has remained
idle. No compensation has yet been paid.
"The 8 percent of the construction cost promised by the United States was
covered by Japan and the European Union temporarily, but work went ahead on
credit after that," another Seoul official said. "It is unclear who will pay
that back."
Seoul officials claim that South Korea made an offer to provide electricity
to the North in return for ending the reactor project, thus it should not
become the main financier of the termination.
*************************************************
3. USA CANCELS FOOD AID TO DPRK
by Nicholas Kralev, The Washington Times: 3 December 2005
The Bush administration has cancelled a planned shipment of 25,000 tons of
food aid to North Korea later this month, citing concerns that the food will
not reach those who need it.
"We still think there are serious humanitarian needs in North Korea, but we
cannot continue to supply food if we cannot even minimally assure that it
will reach its intended recipients," the State Department said yesterday.
The UN World Food Program (WFP), which distributes foreign aid, has been
ordered by the North Koreans to cut most of its staff there by the end of
December, a move that will substantially reduce its ability to disburse and
monitor aid shipments. Washington sent the first half of a 50,000-ton pledge
for 2005 in the spring and had planned to deliver the rest, until
Pyongyang's recent decision to expel the majority of the WFP personnel.
"We have not procured the 25,000 tons originally scheduled to have been
shipped later this month, due to uncertainties about whether the [WFP]
emergency feeding operation, to which it was to be delivered, would still be
in place to receive it and monitor its distribution," the State Department
said.
This is not the first time the Bush administration has withheld humanitarian
aid to the impoverished communist nation. It cut off supplies of fuel oil in
2002 amid reports that the North had continued its efforts to make nuclear
weapons, despite an earlier pledge not to do so. In early 2003, the
administration withheld grain shipments, citing concerns that the
distribution of aid could not be monitored. US officials said yesterday they
decide where to send food aid based on three criteria: the need in the
country, the need elsewhere and the availability of effective monitoring.
The third requirement cannot be met without the WFP's help, a State
Department official said, noting there are no other reasons to withhold the
aid.
"We don't use food as a weapon," the official said. "The three criteria are
not connected to the state of our political relations with North Korea."
State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said the United States is "in
close contact" with the WFP "on these issues as well as other donor
countries."
When Pyongyang announced its decision to expel most of the staff of
international organizations in the North, it said that the humanitarian
situation in the country has improved dramatically and aid is no longer
needed in its present quantity. The WFP program delivers about half a
million tons of food a year in North Korea and aims to feed about 6.5
million of the nation's 22.5 million people. It has a staff of 47 persons
there. The WFP said this week that its negotiations with the North Korean
government to switch from food aid to development-focused programs and
maintain most of its presence have made no progress.
"Consultations with major donors are also being held to come up with a
solution which is suitable to all stake-holders," the WFP said. (...)
*************************************************
FOCUS: Counterfeits and sanctions stall six-party talks
*************************************************
4. STOP COUNTERFEITING OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY: RICE
USA Today, Washington, DC, 28 November 2005
[Excerpt of an interview with Secretary Condoleezza Rice conducted by
Barbara Slavin and Ray Locker of USA Today.]
QUESTION: Can we turn to North Korea, if I could, just quickly? There was a
short round. Things don't seem to be going very quickly. I mean, while the
Bush Administration has been in office, the North Koreans may have developed
enough plutonium for another six bombs. How long does it go on like this? Is
there any other option that we can use to influence the North Koreans or
concern that this process just doesn't seem to be going anywhere fast?
SECRETARY RICE: Well, we are making -- we are doing other things. For
instance, we are working with others in the Proliferation Security
Initiative to deal with the potential for shipments of WMD-related
materials, and on at least one very highly publicized occasion we made a
very good hit leading ultimately to the -- I think to reinforcing the Libyan
decision. That was a North Korean shipment. We have, of course, made very
clear that we intend to deal with banks that are dealing in illicit proceeds
for North Korea. So we're not sitting still while the six-party talks
continue.
But I think the six-party talks themselves, first of all, have solidified a
consensus at least among the five about North Korea's -- about the only path
ahead for North Korea, which is to have -- to abandon its nuclear weapons
programs if it wishes to fully access the international system. And there is
now a statement of principles to which the parties are agreed, and when the
North Koreans have tried to veer off those principles, others have brought
them back to those principles. So I think you have a starting place with
those principles for negotiation. But it will have to make more progress --
QUESTION: Are you going to invite a couple of the North Korean negotiators
to New York to discuss the sanctions, the bank issue? I understand that
there's a proposal to have them come to New York to continue talks and --
SECRETARY RICE: I think that we are prepared to tell the North Koreans what
our laws are, but they know what they're doing. They don't need to have a
bilateral on how to stop counterfeiting other people's money. Just stop
doing it.
*************************************************
5. US PERFIDY UNDER FIRE
Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), Pyongyang, 6 December 2005
The US is persisting in such perfidy as escalating its sanctions and
pressure upon the DPRK reneging on its promise made to the DPRK at the first
phase of the fifth round of the six-party talks. This comes under fire by a
signed commentary of Rodong Sinmun Tuesday. The news analyst says: This is
evidenced by its behaviour of shunning the proposed DPRK-US direct talks to
discuss the issue of lifting financial sanctions against the DPRK under this
or that pretext. This only increases public scepticism about the possibility
to resume the six-party talks.
In order for the six-party talks to proceed smoothly in a sound atmosphere
and make progress it is necessary for the participating countries to be
discreet in their words and deeds in the direction of respecting each other
and promoting the relations of confidence. However, the US diplomatic chief,
when interviewed by the USA Today shortly ago, openly blustered that there
is no need to hold DPRK-US bilateral talks over the lift of financial
sanctions, hinting that the US is pressurizing the DPRK in all aspects.
Such behaviour of the US cannot be construed otherwise than a deliberate act
to touch off anti-American sentiment among the servicepersons and people in
the DPRK and deter the six-party talks from resuming. It is impossible to
resume the six-party talks under such provocative sanctions applied by the
US upon the DPRK.
This is the stand of the DPRK. The prospect of the six-party talks will
depend on whether the U. S. works hard to build confidence with the DPRK on
the principle of mutual respect and equality or persists in its
self-justified and unilateral acts. If the US truly wants the resumption and
progress of the six-party talks it should take practical measures to lift
the financial sanctions against the DPRK at an early date as it committed
itself to do so before the other five parties at the talks. Only then a
prospect will be opened for the resumption of the six-party talks.
*************************************************
6. DPRK ACCUSED OF COUNTERFEITING US CURRENCY
by Bill Gertz, Staff Reporter, Washington Times, 2 December 2005
North Korea's government has produced more than $45 million in high-quality
fake $100 bills since 1989 and is the world's only state-sponsored producer
of the so-called "supernote," according to US law-enforcement officials. The
recent arrest of Sean Garland, head of the communist Workers Party of
Ireland, provided the first confirmation of the Pyongyang government's links
to the supernote or superdollar, which was discovered as part of a
16-year-old probe by the US Secret Service, which is in charge of
investigating illegal money production. Vic Erevia, assistant special agent
in charge of the criminal investigative division at the Secret Service, said
the probe resulted in 160 arrests linked to counterfeiting and related
activities worldwide.
Meanwhile, the State Department yesterday defended Treasury Department
sanctions imposed in September on the Banco Delta Asia in Macao for its role
in North Korean counterfeiting and money laundering.
"We said from the very beginning that we are not going to fail ... to act
concerning issues that are of concern to us, whether that happens to be on
the human rights front, or whether that happens to be on taking steps to
prevent disbursement of counterfeit US bills on the world market," said
spokesman Sean McCormack.
The Treasury Department said senior officials at Banco Delta Asia handled
large cash deposits, including counterfeit US currency, supplied by North
Korean officials and agreed to put the fake currency into circulation. The
department blocked the bank from doing business with US financial
institutions. Pyongyang suggested it might back out of the six-party nuclear
talks in protest.
"This is one of the most significant cases we've had, especially with this
particular, highly deceptive counterfeit note," Mr. Erevia said of the North
Korean supernote. "The investigation remains active and ongoing."
North Korea has produced 19 variations of the supernote since it first
appeared in Manila in 1989, law-enforcement officials said. Each variation
was an improvement and looked and felt almost identical to genuine $100
bills. A close look shows the printing on a supernote is slightly lighter
than that on a genuine note. The bills were printed on North Korea's
intaglio-process offset printing presses bought in the 1970s. The machines
are used by governments worldwide to print currency and by private firms
that do so. The North Korean supernotes are considered the highest-quality
forgeries and are better than the more numerous fake notes produced in
Colombia. The officials said reports that Iran has produced supernotes are
not true.
"In this case, we don't have any indication that it was anyone other than
North Korea that was producing the [supernote] from the very beginning,"
said an official, who with colleagues revealed details of the case on the
condition of anonymity.
A cashier found the first North Korean supernote in Manila in 1989. A short
time later, a North Korean diplomat was caught passing forged notes in
Belgrade. In 1994, several North Korean trading company officials were
arrested after depositing $250,000 in supernotes in a Macao bank. All were
carrying diplomatic passports. Pyongyang's role in counterfeiting appears to
be part of an array of illegal activities that include drug trafficking and
arms sales.
"There's this whole portfolio of illicit activities which they engage in to
support the regime, and this is just another one of those items in that
portfolio," the official said.
One Asian diplomat said intelligence reports from North Korean defectors
indicated that Pyongyang and its intelligence services have used supernotes
to support personal activities and foreign purchases of leader Kim Jong-il.
The North Korean government's involvement in producing the note was
uncovered by US investigators in 1996 and confirmed in the sealed May
indictment of Mr. Garland that was made public in October. Mr. Garland was
arrested in Belfast on Oct. 7 and charged with being part of a seven-member
ring that trafficked in the counterfeit North Korean notes. He left Northern
Ireland last month for the Republic of Ireland and is being sought by the
State Department for extradition. Informants and electronic wiretaps helped
unravel the case, which included meetings in Russia and Beijing between Mr.
Garland and North Korean diplomats.
"We were able to get ahead of him and actually surveil him [in Moscow]," the
official said. "He is picked up by North Korean diplomats, by a North Korean
limousine, and taken to the North Korean Embassy."
The official said the North Korean government's role hampered the
investigation, complicating efforts to shut down the network and arrest
participants. Several North Korean diplomats have been identified by US
officials as having a role in the network. In March, Interpol issued a
notice warning currency manufacturers and equipment providers that North
Korea's government is engaged in supernote production and distribution.
"We wanted to alert the industry that ... this is something they should be
aware of - that a state is producing counterfeit currency and their products
could be misused to further the illegal activity," a second official said.
The official said the US government has seized about $45 million in North
Korean supernotes over 16 years. The amount is relatively small compared
with about $355 million in lower-quality Colombian counterfeit bills. The
North Korean supernotes have been found by investigators in Ethiopia, Peru,
Macao and Germany. The officials said Mr. Garland used his party connections
and a Dublin business known as GKG Communications International Ltd. to
arrange the supernote deals.
Asked about Chinese involvement with Mr. Garland and the North Koreans, one
official said reports about a Chinese connection could not be confirmed. A
top-secret US intelligence report obtained by The Washington Times in 1997,
however, linked Mr. Garland and China to the supernotes. The report said Mr.
Garland was involved in supernote trafficking and had met in 1997 with Cao
Xiaobing, a Chinese Communist Party International Liaison Department (ILD)
official, to discuss "unidentified business opportunities." The ILD is a
party organ linked to implementing China's policy toward North Korea. In
addition to Mr. Garland's network of counterfeiters, a Chinese
organized-crime group uncovered in the summer in California and New Jersey
also was involved in selling North Korean supernotes, the officials said.
Counterfeiting remains a problem for the US government because even though
only some of the $730 billion in US currency in circulation worldwide is
counterfeit, the use of fake notes undermines the integrity of all US money,
officials said.
"If people who use US currency don't believe they can tell the difference
between the counterfeit and genuine, all the currency becomes suspect," the
first official said. "That's why it's very troubling."
The official said it is likely the North Koreans are using the supernotes in
international drug trafficking. North Korean diplomats and intelligence
personnel have been engaged in trafficking of heroin and methamphetamine to
Russia, China, Japan and other nations. The illicit activities are thought
to generate hard currency for Mr. Kim's regime, accused by North Korean
government defectors of directing the counterfeiting and drug trafficking.
Law-enforcement officials said it is difficult to verify the defectors'
information.
However, after years of intelligence and defector reports, "you have this
catalogue of information that starts to build up and you start to see a
pattern develop," one official said.
According to the US indictment, "Quantities of the supernote were
manufactured in, and under auspices of the government of, the Democratic
People's Republic of Korea (North Korea). "Individuals, including North
Korean nationals acting as ostensible government officials, engaged in the
worldwide transportation, delivery, and sale of quantities of supernotes,"
the indictment, unsealed Oct. 7, stated.
David L. Asher, who monitored North Korean criminal activity when working at
the State Department, said the scale of the crime is difficult to determine
but that the activities provide hard currency for the Pyongyang regime.
"Under international law, counterfeiting another nation's currency is an act
of casus belli, an act of economic war," Mr. Asher said in a recent speech.
"No other government has engaged in this act against another government
since the Nazis under Hitler."
Mr. Asher said that in addition to drugs and counterfeit money, Pyongyang is
engaged in money laundering, arms sales and illicit trade in sanctioned
items, such as conflict diamonds, rhino horn and ivory. North Korea has
become a "Soprano state," he said, a reference to the television show about
a New Jersey organized-crime group.
"North Korea is the only government in the world today that can be
identified as being actively involved in directing crime as a central part
of its national economic strategy and foreign policy," Mr. Asher said.
North Korea's government has denied it engages in counterfeiting. The
government-run Korean Central News Agency said Oct. 21 that the indictment
charging a Pyongyang role in counterfeiting was part of a US "smear
campaign."
"The US-escalated smear campaign against the DPRK only goes to prove that
the former regards it as one of the basic means to create impression that
the latter is a 'rogue state' in a bid to realize its ambition for bringing
down the latter's 'system' and the former remains unchanged in its policy
for isolating and stifling the DPRK internationally," the report said.
*************************************************
7. ROK CALLS FOR DIRECT US-DPRK TALKS
by Jae-soon Chang, Associated Press, 5 December 2005
South Korea's top official responsible for relations with North Korea urged
the United States on Monday to hold direct talks with the North to resolve
concerns over its missile development, human rights abuses and other
non-nuclear issues, a report said Monday. The remarks by Unification
Minister Chung Dong-young reflected concerns that a deepening row between
Washington and North Korea over US sanctions against the country could
undermine six-nation talks on ending the North's nuclear programs.
Non-nuclear complaints by the United States against North Korea "should be
solved by bilateral talks between the two parties," Chung told a forum,
according to South Korea's Yonhap news agency. "As the six-party talks focus
on resolving the nuclear issue, other matters should be separated from the
six-party issue."
Chung listed the North's missiles, biochemical and conventional weapons and
human rights abuses, as well as its alleged involvement in drug trafficking
and counterfeiting of money, as among the major non-nuclear issues. The US
has so far showed no willingness to separate the nuclear and non-nuclear
issues, discussing both at the six-nation talks. It has also rejected the
North's demand for one-on-one negotiations, saying all countries in the
region must be involved in efforts to get it to disarm. (...)
Prospects for a resumption of the negotiations dimmed last week after North
Korea reacted angrily to financial sanctions imposed by Washington over
alleged counterfeiting and money laundering. North Korea had warned that
such actions could affect the nuclear talks.
*************************************************
8. US ENVOY CALLS PYONGYANG A 'CRIMINAL REGIME'
The Chosun Ilbo, Digital Chosun, 7 December 2005
US Ambassador to Korea Alexander Vershbow on Wednesday made international
headlines by calling the North Korean government a "criminal regime."
Vershbow made the remark at the Kwanhun Club, a gathering of senior South
Korean journalists, when the subject of North Korea's alleged currency
counterfeiting came up.
Vershbow said North Korea's was the first regime involved in
government-sponsored currency counterfeiting "since Adolf Hitler." Candid
criticism of North Korea from a US diplomat here is rare in a public forum.
It was Vershbow's first meeting with the press since he took office in
October.
Foreign Minister Ban Ki-moon urged caution, saying countries involved in
six-party talks on the North's nuclear program "need to exercise restraint
in the words they choose to describe each other."
At the meeting, Vershbow's position diverged widely from Seoul's on such
issues as international recognition of the North Korean regime, human rights
and counterfeiting.
Asked about US sanctions on North Korean firms for their alleged involvement
in various criminal activities, Vershbow said, "This is a criminal regime,
and you can't somehow remove sanctions as a political gesture when this
regime is engaging in dangerous activities such as weapons exports to rogue
states."
North Korea has warned it could stay away from six-party talks unless the
sanctions are lifted. Vershbow added the measures were taken under US law
and were non-negotiable. Seoul, by contrast, has suggested Pyongyang and
Washington solve the problem in bilateral meetings.
The envoy expressed hope an international conference on North Korea's human
rights abuses that starts in Seoul on Thursday will not be a political
platform but a chance to find a strategy for real change in the lives of
North Koreans. Vershbow is taking part in the conference. Asked about the
South Korean government's attitude toward human rights in the North, he said
South Korea and the US had the same goal even if their approach was
different, adding he got the impression from talks with South Korean
officials and lawmakers that they are concerned about the issue.
In more conciliatory remarks, commenting on North Korean leader Kim Jong-il,
Vershbow said though a leader made mistakes, he could still bring about
change. If North Korea changes, the US is ready to reassess its own stance
on the North, he added.
*************************************************
QUIDNUNC
In this section of CanKor, we invite readers to send questions, answers, or
responses. Answers should be under 150 words and may be edited for space.
*************************************************
HOW BIG IS THE DPR KOREAN PEOPLE'S ARMY?
Good question -- really difficult for outsiders to assess, especially those
of us without security clearances.
Here's my take: the "1993" DPRK census reveals a discrepancy between total
country population count and identified population by region and major city
of slightly under 700,000 persons. Following Chinese practice, this
difference is implicitly the national military force. The statistical
implication is that KPA and ROKA were almost identical in size. Cute!
The problem is the strange anomalies and inconsistencies in the DPRK
demographic data. These suggest that perhaps as many as 400,000 or more
young men are being "hidden" from the count. (I've explained this
elsewhere -- my study "Our own style of statistics").
The indication then is that the DPRK considers itself to have a military
force of over one million -- or at least, did in 1993. Note this tells us
nothing about readiness capabilities or activities of those in the military
services -- for all we know from these raw numbers, they could all be on
road crews, or up growing opium!
Nicholas N. Eberstadt
*************************************************
HOW MANY NORTH KOREAN REFUGEES ARE IN CHINA?
Hunger, illness, unemployment, and oppression have compelled tens of
thousands of North Koreans to leave their homeland since 1995. Most have
risked imprisonment, even execution by crossing into China. Their exact
number is impossible to know. Estimates have ranged from a high of
50,000-300,000 in 1996 and 1997, to 15,000-50,000 in 2000. More recent
estimates fall somewhere between these two numbers. The office of the United
Nations High Commissioner on Refugees (UNHCR) appears comfortable with the
15,000-50,000 estimate.
[Answer taken from Kenneth Quinones, "Understanding North Korea," Alpha
Books, p. 27]
*************************************************
WHAT NOW?
In CanKor #228, Glyn Ford writes, "without the knowledge of the European
Commission let alone the North Koreans, the French bounced through the
Council of Ministers a condemnatory resolution."
QUESTION: What reasons do you know of for the tactics of the French, i.e.
what independent French reasons existed for this? Or were they acting
indirectly for the EU? Or were they doing so at US behest?
J Gibbs
[Answers should be e-mailed to: editor at CanKor.ca]
*************************************************
End CanKor # 229
*************************************************
CanKor is an electronic information service for readers interested in the
issues of peace and security on the Korean peninsula, published by
Weingartner Consulting. Financial support is received from the Canadian
International Development Agency (CIDA). Views expressed on the CanKor
website or weekly digest are those of the respective authors, and do not
necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of CanKor, CIDA or
Weingartner Consulting. CanKor accepts no liability for inaccuracies, errors
or omissions. Copyright of all items listed or reprinted rests with the
original publishers. CanKor provides links to originals when available. To
subscribe or unsubscribe, and for all other communication, please address
the CanKor editorial team by e-mail at editor at CanKor.ca. Editor: Erich
Weingartner; Managing Editor: Miranda Weingartner; Research: Marion Current,
Ilene Solomon, Danielle Goldfinger; Web developer: David Seguin. Please
visit our website at: www.CanKor.ca
*************************************************
More information about the CanKor
mailing list