Cankor Report #277
cankor at nautilus.org
cankor at nautilus.org
Mon Mar 26 20:57:34 CST 2007
WHAT READERS SAY ABOUT THE CANKOR REPORT:
"Reading the CanKor newsletter has been one of my important things to
do! Thank you for your great work."
Myeong H. Jang, Reporter at Radio Free Asia, Korean Service,
Washington D.C.
Dear friends,
CanKor is a reader-supported e-publication and website. We believe
that an informed public will draw its own conclusions about what needs
to be done to bring peace and security to the Korean Peninsula, and
that decision-makers will benefit from the debates and analyses of
experts made accessible through the CanKor Report.
We do not charge a subscription fee, but request financial
contributions from those who are able.
We thank readers who have sent donations to CanKor. Those who have not
yet had the time to contribute but wish to do so, please refer to the
bottom of this Report for instructions. We issue receipts for all
donations received.
With best wishes,
The CanKor team.
*************************************************
CANADA-KOREA ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SERVICE
CanKor # 277
Friday, 23 March 2007
*************************************************
The Six-Party plenary scheduled to review the progress of working
groups fails to begin after four days of waiting. The DPRK side
insists that the transfer of approximately 25 million dollars of
frozen Banco Delta Asia accounts needs to be completed before talks
can resume. While there is considerable gnashing of teeth and finger
pointing in Washington, an optimistic Assistant Secretary Christopher
R. Hill says it is "quite possible" that talks could start again
within a week or two once the financial issue has been cleared up. A
creative solution to the financial deadlock was found during bilateral
USA-DPRK negotiations, but the current hold-up seems to be on the
Chinese side. The affected moneys were supposed to be deposited into a
North Korean account at the Bank of China. The delays are caused by a
concern that accepting funds suspected to be linked to counterfeiting
and money laundering could in turn make the Chinese bank vulnerable to
US Treasury sanctions.
This week's CanKor FOCUS examines the solution to a conundrum: how to
meet the DPRK's demand to regain control of its frozen assets as a way
to make progress in the Six-Party talks, while at the same time
allowing the US Treasury Department to maintain its judgment on money
laundering and counterfeiting. The point of view of Daedong Credit
Bank, the largest non-North Korean account holder of the frozen funds,
is examined. Rounding out this issue of the CanKor Report is the
transcript of a press conference in which Chris Hill and Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Treasury for Terrorist Financing and Financial
Crimes Daniel Glaser answer questions about the financial deal made
with the DPRK before the start of the non-started Six-Party plenary.
*************************************************
Contents:
1. NUCLEAR TALKS BREAK DOWN, NO RESTART DATE SET
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6499509,00.html
FOCUS: The banking conundrum
2. DAEDONG CREDIT BATTLES TO SURVIVE US EMBARGO
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/08/news/north.php
3. MASTERFUL SOLUTION TO DPRK FROZEN ACCOUNTS
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200703/200703150021.html
4. PRESS CONFERENCE WITH CHRIS HILL AND DANIEL GLASER
http://www.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2007/81860.htm
*************************************************
1. NUCLEAR TALKS BREAK DOWN, NO RESTART DATE SET
Bo-Mi Lim, Associated Press, 22 March 2007
[Associated Press writers Mari Yamaguchi, Audra Ang and Christopher
Bodeen in Beijing, Jae-Soon Chang in Seoul, and Sylvia Hui in Hong
Kong contributed to this report.]
Talks on halting North Korea's nuclear program broke down Thursday,
throwing into doubt efforts to meet deadlines next month for UN
inspectors to verify the closure of Pyongyang's main nuclear reactor.
The latest round of talks never got off the ground this week because
of a dispute over the transfer of North Korean money that had been
frozen in Macau bank accounts. China issued a statement saying they
would take a recess but did not give a restart date.
"The parties agreed to recess and will resume the talks at the
earliest opportunity to continue to discuss and formulate an action
plan for the next phase," the statement said.
Even before the statement was released chief North Korean negotiator
Kim Kye Gwan had flown out of Beijing, after staying away from the
talks for several days, upset that US$25 million in North Korean funds
had remained stuck at the Banco Delta Asia in Macau, a Chinese
territory.
"This round of talks started with the BDA problem and ended with the
BDA problem," Japanese envoy Kenichiro Sasae said of the negotiations
to follow up an agreement reached last month calling on Pyongyang to
give up its nuclear ambitions in exchange for energy aid and political
concessions. The money in the Macau bank had been frozen by a US
investigation into money laundering and counterfeiting, but the United
States agreed earlier this week to a North Korean proposal to release
the money and transfer it to a Bank of China account in Beijing. Sasae
said talks needed to resume quickly, otherwise there would be problems
meeting a deadline set in a Feb. 13 denuclearization agreement that
calls for UN inspectors to verify the closure of North Korea's main
nuclear reactor at Yongbyon by April 14. "The actions in the initial
phase must be taken within 60 days and it will be heavily affected by
the pace of our settlement of the BDA problem," he told reporters.
But Hill told a news conference he is still optimistic the deadlines
can still be met. "It is our strong view that we are still on schedule
to meet all the 60-day requirements," Hill said, referring to an April
14 deadline that calls for UN inspectors to verify the closure of
North Korea's main nuclear reactor at Yongbyon. Hill added he still
expected other goals requiring Pyongyang to declare all of its nuclear
programs and for fuel and economic assistance to be sent to North
Korea to be met by the end of the year.
Chinese negotiator Wu Dawei said that in a last-ditch effort to
salvage the talks he called Kim late at night to persuade him to take
part in the talks. "When I called Vice Minister Kim Kye Gwan it was
11:15 at night ... He got out of bed after taking his sleeping pills
to take my call," Wu said. Wu then had to convince an operator at the
hotel of US envoy Christopher Hill to wake Hill at 1:30 a.m. to
discuss the impasse. "I reckon Hill hadn't thought there was any work
going on at that hour," Wu said.
The North Korean funds were to have been sent to its bank account at
the Bank of China in Beijing but officials said that was held up
because of the Chinese bank's worries that accepting the money would
cause problems because the funds had been the center of criminal
investigations. "The Bank of China has concerns (about accepting the
money) and not all the concerns have been assuaged," Wu said.
Adding to the confusion over the matter, the Bank of China denied
Thursday that it was told to accept the money. "I can tell you that up
until now, we were not asked to deal with this business," Li Lihui,
the bank's vice chairman and president, told reporters while
announcing the bank's 2006 earnings in Hong Kong.
In Tokyo, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe criticized North Korea for not
being constructive. "It's clear there is nothing for North Korea to
gain from this kind of move," Abe said. "This kind of attitude is
meaningless." North Korea will only be accepted by the international
society if it takes concrete steps toward complying with its
commitment to dismantle its nuclear programs, Abe said. This round of
talks has been dogged by the bank troubles since it started on Monday.
Russian envoy Alexander Losyukov, who also left for home Thursday, was
quoted by ITAR-Tass news agency as saying "the whole problem came from
the American side." He said the United States failed to assure the
Chinese side that the Bank of China could receive the funds, which
were linked to a counterfeiting and money laundering investigation,
without fear of facing US sanctions or a "negative attitude" from the
banking community and the US government.
US banks were required to cut links with Banco Delta Asia as a result
of the Treasury investigation. The North boycotted the international
nuclear talks for more than a year over the issue. Under the Feb. 13
deal, the North is to receive energy and economic aid and a start
toward normalizing relations with the USA and Japan, in return for
beginning the disarmament process. The regime would ultimately receive
assistance equivalent to 1 million tons of heavy fuel oil if it fully
discloses and dismantles all its nuclear programs.
*************************************************
FOCUS: The banking conundrum
*************************************************
2. DAEDONG CREDIT BATTLES TO SURVIVE US EMBARGO
Donald Greenlees, International Herald Tribune, 8 March 2007
Last August, Colin McAskill, a British businessman, agreed to buy a
small bank in North Korea. On the face of it, Daedong Credit Bank was
not a brilliant investment. The agreement that McAskill signed with
Daedong Credit's foreign management at a hotel in Seoul came as the
bank was caught in the grip of financial sanctions that had virtually
cut North Korea off from the global financial system. Financial
institutions around the world were shunning any links to North Korean
banks, making it almost impossible to transact business.
Daedong Credit was using couriers to carry cash in amounts as high as
$2.6 million in and out of the country because it could not make
electronic transfers to other banks. Since September 2005, Daedong
Credit had also been fighting to recover $7 million that had been
frozen in a Macao bank as part of efforts by the United States to put
a financial squeeze on North Korea over alleged illicit financial
transactions. This was a big sum for Daedong Credit. When McAskill had
examined the bank's books, its total assets were just $10 million.
None of this has deterred him. He said in an interview here that he
plans to execute the sale agreement within the next two weeks and take
full control of North Korea's only foreign-managed bank. The Hong
Kong-based Koryo Asia, chaired by McAskill, will take control of the
banking license and a 70 percent stake owned by British investors
through a Virgin Islands company. The remaining 30 percent is held by
the state-owned Daesong Bank.
"I think it's a magnificent deal," McAskill said, although he would
not disclose the purchase price. "The bank has been running for 12
years. It is trusted and it has been profitable since day one."
Despite McAskill's optimism, Daedong Credit's future has been under a
cloud since the imposition of the US-orchestrated banking embargo on
North Korea 18 months ago and the viability of the business remains
precarious. Even amid signs of a thaw in relations between Pyongyang
and Washington, the start of a bilateral dialogue that began in New
York on Monday and an agreement in six-nation talks in Beijing on Feb.
13 to start to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula, analysts say banks
in North Korea will struggle to restore contacts with the global
financial system.
The trigger for the financial embargo of North Korea was a declaration
by the US Treasury Department under section 311 of the Patriot Act
that the Macao-based Banco Delta Asia was a "primary money laundering
concern" because of its links to a number of North Korean banks,
individuals and companies alleged to have engaged in product and
currency counterfeiting, drug trafficking and weapons proliferation.
The US and Macanese authorities began separate investigations into
Banco Delta Asia and the bank was placed under Macao government
supervision.
Along with about 50 North Korean banks, trading companies and
individuals, Daedong Credit had its account frozen. The total amount
put into "suspense accounts," according to Banco Delta Asia, was about
$25 million, with Daedong Credit accounting for the largest share.
Since then, almost all foreign banks that had correspondent relations
with Daedong Credit have severed contact for fear of being excluded
from the US financial system.
Jack Pritchard, president of the Korea Economic Institute in
Washington, said it was unlikely that the United States would send an
explicit signal to the financial community to resume trading with
North Korea, regardless of whether Pyongyang starts to address
concerns about its foreign financial transactions. He said that
although a portion of the frozen money was likely to be released soon,
there would not be a "100 percent reversal" of the American stance on
financial transactions with North Korea.
Daedong Credit is likely to be one of the first North Korean account
holders in Banco Delta Asia to get its money back from the Macao
Monetary Authority where it has been earning no interest.
In recent months, McAskill has circled the globe from his home in
London acting under a mandate from Daedong Credit to persuade
officials in Washington and Macao to release the account. At 66,
McAskill has spent 28 years doing business with North Korea, including
as a consultant to North Korean banks on debt negotiations and helping
to operate North Korea's foreign gold sales. He said that at no stage
in his meetings with officials from either the USA or Macao
governments has he seen any specific reason for freezing the Daedong
Credit money or been told of any specific allegation about its
origins.
McAskill has produced what he calls a "dossier of proof" to establish
the identity of all the customers whose money is frozen and the
sources of the money. Since it was founded by the failed Hong Kong
finance group Peregrine in 1995, Daedong Credit has filled a valuable
niche serving Pyongyang's foreign community. It has about 200
customers among foreign-invested joint ventures, foreign relief
organizations and foreign individuals, according to McAskill. The
biggest single amount frozen in Macao is $2.6 million belonging to
British American Tobacco, which owns a cigarette plant in North Korea.
"We irrefutably established that the money was legal," McAskill said.
"The US Treasury have been going around the world saying to banks
'close this account, close that account' but not offering any proof of
wrongdoing." He said his due diligence of Daedong Credit had convinced
him that it was a "fully legal, legitimate operation" that did not
manage state accounts or had ever been connected to illicit practices.
One of Treasury's main allegations against Banco Delta Asia is that it
facilitated the spread of counterfeit $100 bills. But McAskill said
Daedong Credit had put $49 million into Banco Delta Asia in 2005 and
all that money had been forwarded to HSBC for verification. Only three
of the $100 notes belonging to Daedong Credit were confiscated because
they were "suspect," he said. McAskill has charged the Treasury with
harassment after two correspondent banks -- one in Vietnam and the
other in Mongolia -- informed Daedong Credit late last year that they
would immediately close accounts because of pressure from the United
States.
But it is likely to prove difficult to convince banks, spooked by the
impact on Banco Delta Asia of the long-running Treasury investigation,
to take the risk of dealing with a North Korean counterpart,
regardless of the pedigree of its shareholders and board.
Last week, at a meeting in Macao, McAskill was finally told by the
head of a government-appointed committee supervising Banco Delta Asia,
Herculano de Sousa, that it was likely the money in Daedong Credit
would be returned by the end of March. In the meeting, McAskill told
de Sousa that once the funds were freed, Daedong Credit intended to
leave the money in Banco Delta Asia and resume operating its old
account.
Banco Delta Asia has informed the US Treasury that as part of its
cleanup both the administrative committee and the shareholders were
adamant that they would no longer do business with any North Korea
entities. In doing so, the bank hopes to avoid the United States
making good on a threat to ban Banco Delta Asia from having any
correspondent relationships with US banks.
Still, McAskill insisted that Daedong Credit has not broken any law in
Macao or elsewhere and there are no grounds for it to be forced to
close its account. "I am not going to take my money back and cut and
run," he said.
*************************************************
3. MASTERFUL SOLUTION TO DPRK FROZEN ACCOUNTS
Chosun Ilbo, 15 March 2007
Concluding its 18-month long investigation of North Korea's bank in
Macau, the US Treasury Department on Wednesday announced measures
barring US financial institutions from direct and indirect deals with
Banco Delta Asia. The USA accuses the bank of having been a
money-laundering channel for the North's illicit activities. The ban
goes into effect in 30 days.
But the step paves the way for Macau authorities to unfreeze North
Korean accounts containing US$24 million in what is rumoured to be
North Korean leader Kim Jong Il's personal money in the bank. "Our
investigation of BDA confirmed the bank's willingness to turn a blind
eye to illicit activity, notably by its North Korean-related clients.
In fact, in exchange for a fee, the bank provided its North Korean
clients access to the banking system with little oversight or
control," Treasury Under Secretary Stuart Levey told reporters
Wednesday. According to the department, BDA helped North Korea handle
funds from illicit activities like counterfeiting US dollars,
manufacturing fake cigarettes and drug dealings. Some North Korean
companies possibly laundered money through the bank, it said.
Despite the relatively paltry sum, the freeze of the accounts prompted
North Korea to boycott six-party talks on its nuclear program for more
than a year, and talks only resumed after the USA and North Korea met
in Berlin in January and agreed to sort the matter out. The six-nation
talks then swiftly produced an agreement in Beijing on Feb. 13 whereby
North Korea promised to take initial steps toward disabling its
nuclear facilities in return for energy aid from the other five.
However, the Treasury said the unfreezing of North Korean accounts is
up to Macau authorities and declined to mention the exact amount that
will be unfrozen. The department said it has informed Macau of the
investigation results. As a result, Macanese authorities will probably
unfreeze part of the money up to 12 million that apparently came from
legal activities. Some observers believe China will unfreeze all of
the accounts in consideration of ties with its Stalinist ally.
Meanwhile, ahead of the official announcement, a South Korean
government official quipped the BDA case would serve as "prize
material for students of international relations and financial
matters." Since seeking a more conciliatory approach with North Korea,
the USA has been wracking its brains how to handle the problem of the
frozen $24 million. Until then, the USA heavily publicized the
money-laundering allegations as a way to pressure the North, but since
late last year, it has sought a way out to make progress in the
six-party talks. The solution the USA appears to have come up with is
to point out the unlawfulness of BDA's actions but wash its hands of
the North Korean accounts. "It seems the USA has passed sentence but
suspended it," said Nam Sung Wook, a North Korea specialist at Korea
University.
Financial experts, looking at past examples, describe the solution as
a masterful touch. Despite allowing North Korea to retrieve the money,
the USA is not publicly budging from its designation of the bank as a
"primary money-laundering concern." Most of the financial institutions
in countries like Lithuania and Burma the USA designated as primary
money-laundering concerns in the past have either gone bankrupt or
been taken over. At the moment, the North looks highly likely to get
all of its money even if BDA goes bankrupt, and even before that it
will get at least half of its money back.
Experts say the solution means nobody wins. Through a long-term
investigation, the USA looked at some 100,000 North Korean financial
transactions. A South Korean government official said, "We understand
that after an investigation of about 50 North Korean accounts at BDA,
the USA has obtained a considerable amount of information on the
North's financial deals" -- enough, it would seem, to bring the BDA
accounts up as a bargaining chip again any time it needs. But
Washington could also face criticism that it exaggerated the
information in the first place, considering that it did not present
any decisive evidence, citing confidentiality, but let North Korea
have the money.
North Korea, for its part, will find it more difficult to carry out
international financial transactions now allegations of counterfeiting
and money laundering have been very publicly confirmed. But by digging
in its heels over the BDA accounts, North Korea, once part of the
"axis of evil", was also able to win talks about normalization of
diplomatic ties with the USA and other benefits.
*************************************************
4. PRESS CONFERENCE WITH CHRIS HILL AND DANIEL GLASER
US State Dept Press Release, St. Regis Hotel, Beijing, 19 March
2007
[The following are excerpts of a press conference with Christopher R.
Hill, Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, and
Daniel Glaser, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Treasury for Terrorist
Financing and Financial Crimes]
ASSISTANT SECRETARY HILL: Well we've been busy, and we're very pleased
that we've been able to reach an understanding with the DPRK on the
full return of funds as soon as possible. So, I'm going to introduce
my colleague and friend Danny Glaser here -- who's been traveling the
Pacific and watching all those movies on those airplanes -- to tell
you what exactly has happened. And we can take some of your questions.
Danny?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY GLASER: Thanks, Ambassador Hill. I do have
a prepared statement to read, and I am going to read it. But before I
start I do want to just thank Ambassador Hill for all the support that
he's given us. He's really -- he's been pretty involved and has
provided us very, very important guidance and advice and support on
the diplomatic end of this. I really do think that in the future when
people look back on this, they will look at this as a model for the
way the Treasury Department and the State Department can work together
in addressing very, very important issues in the international
financial sector. So I just wanted to thank Ambassador Hill for that.
Let me read the prepared statement that I have for you all, and then
I'll be happy to take some questions. And we are going to be releasing
the following prepared statement on the Treasury Department web site:
"The United States and North Korean Governments have reached an
understanding on the disposition of DPRK-related funds frozen at Banco
Delta Asia.
"The DPRK has proposed the transfer of the roughly $25 million frozen
in BDA into an account held by North Korea's Foreign Trade Bank at the
Bank of China in Beijing.
"North Korea has pledged, within the framework of the Six-Party Talks,
that these funds will be used solely for the betterment of the North
Korean people, including for humanitarian and educational purposes. We
believe this resolves the issue of the DPRK-related frozen funds.
"The disposition of the frozen assets has always been and remains a
decision by the Macanese authorities to be taken in accordance with
Macanese law. North Korea will need to work out the legal and
technical intricacies of the arrangement with the Macanese. The
Treasury has communicated to both the Macanese and Chinese Governments
the United States' support of this arrangement.
"Separately, the final rule against Banco Delta Asia, issued by the
Treasury Department under Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act, remains
in place. The Treasury will continue to cooperate with the Macanese on
this and other anti-money laundering issues.
"The events of the past 18 months demonstrate our lack of tolerance
for illicit activity conducted in the global financial system.
Financial institutions that facilitate weapons proliferation,
terrorist financing, narcotics trafficking, and other illicit
financial activity should be on notice of the significant consequences
they face."
That concludes the prepared statement, and, again, we'd be happy to
take questions.
QUESTION: Ambassador Hill, could you explain why it was so difficult
to reach this agreement and why we had to wait for the -- for a
finalization of the agreement between the USA and North Korea?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY HILL: Well, I mean, the problem was, first of all,
we needed to brief the various concerned parties on this. So as soon
as the rule was published, Danny got on an airplane and got out to
Macao within a day or two. He's here in Beijing to talk as well to the
Chinese. And as soon as the North Koreans were able to pull together
their team, I was able to brief them -- I believe it was on Saturday.
So it just took a couple of extra days.
QUESTION: So does this mean that all the money is being released? Does
this mean none of the money was involved in illegal activities?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY HILL: What this means is the North Koreans, the
DPRK, understood our concerns and are prepared to cooperate with us to
make sure this money is used appropriately.
QUESTION: Mr. Glaser, do you not have any concerns that this might
send the wrong message, saying that all the money was involved in
illicit activities?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY GLASER: No, I think the message at this
time is, as I said in the prepared statement, first of all, the broad
message that I think it sends, is that we will not be tolerating
illicit conduct by financial institutions in the international
financial system. With respect to the actual disposition of the funds,
I think it's important to look where we were eighteen months ago and
look where we're going now. Eighteen months ago, these funds were in a
bank that did not have adequate anti-money laundering protections and
that was facilitating illicit activity. There was very little being
done about it. Eighteen months later, the bank is under responsible
management, and we have received assurances that the funds are going
to be transferred to an account in Beijing that can allow them to be
used for humanitarian purposes, for educational purposes.
I think that's a great success. It's all part of an ongoing process to
work with North Korea on trying to address what we've said before are
a lot of the fundamental underlying concerns of the international
financial community.
QUESTION: How do you guarantee those funds will be used for
humanitarian purposes?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY GLASER: Well, there are no guarantees in
this life, but this is an important step in our working through this
problem. The North Koreans have given us assurances that it will be
used for humanitarian purposes, for educational purposes, and we'll
see if we can work this out. We've been meeting them in our bilateral
financial working group. We're going to continue to meet with them in
that group. This is part of an ongoing process of working with North
Korea and explaining to North Korea what the issues are -- what the
concerns of the international financial community are -- and trying to
resolve those concerns.
QUESTION: Sir, you said as soon as possible. How -- what is your
timeframe on the return of the funds?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY GLASER: Well, it's going to have to be
conducted under Macanese law and in conformity with Macanese
procedures and regulations. So that's going to be something for the
North Koreans and the Macanese to work out. It's not going to happen
overnight. There are going to be steps that are going to have to be
taken.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY HILL: But I want to make clear: from the US
perspective, we want it to happen as soon as possible
QUESTION: The fact that these are going into a Bank of China
account -- does that suggest that China will have some responsibility
in ensuring that the funds are used appropriately?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY HILL: I think any regulator has certain
responsibilities, and I would put the Chinese in that category, as
would any regulator of any bank account anywhere.
QUESTION: After saying that it was totally up to the Macanese
authorities how to hand over the money, why is the USA announcing
this?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY GLASER: We had -- I was in Macau just on
Saturday, and we discussed a number of things with the Macanese
authorities. It was an opportunity for us to present the results of
the investigation that we had conducted into BDA, and we did that. It
was an opportunity to discuss the finalization of the Section 311
rule, and it was an opportunity to discuss the overarching mechanisms
that could be used with respect to bringing a resolution to the funds
transfer issue. Now this is a North Korean proposal, and both we and
the Macanese thought that it was a very promising proposal. So I don't
think this is about anyone imposing anything on Macau. I think this
works very well for Macau, and I think that they found it to be a
promising proposal. It will have to be accomplished in conformity with
their laws, and I'm sure it will be.
QUESTION: But it is not only North Korean Government but also the 50
account holders. All of them agree with this agreement? I mean, you
know, the money to be used for the humanitarian assistance? Because
the bank holders are not only North Korean government, right?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY GLASER: That's right. There are non-North
Korean Government account holders, and again, this will have to be
conducted within Macanese law. And I'm sure the Macanese and the North
Koreans -- I'm sure the Macanese will discuss it with the North
Koreans and explain to them exactly what needs to be done to
accomplish this. (...)
QUESTION: Mr. Glaser, you been acting under the strict laws of the
Patriot Act, or whatever the law is. How do you respond to the
argument that the whole disagreement is motivated by political
purposes?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY GLASER: We've laid our case out publicly;
we laid our case out when we issued the notice for proposed
rule-making. I think it's a fairly straightforward one. This was a
bank that did not have adequate anti-money laundering controls. In
spite of that it was soliciting high-risk clients. It was not only
soliciting those high-risk clients but was providing them with a
facilitative environment to engage in deceptive financial practices.
This wasn't a very difficult case for us.
QUESTION: How do you verify the money will be used properly for
humanitarian and educational purposes? How will the United States
verify?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY GLASER: As I said, there are no guarantees
in this, and we're embarking into this in the spirit of an ongoing
process. We have received assurances. We're expecting that the
assurances will be lived up to. We will be engaged in an ongoing
dialogue, and we're going to have to take it from there. If North
Korea wants to have access to the international financial system,
they're going to have to start getting used to working productively
with other members of the international financial system. Hopefully
this is something that's going to be beneficial for everybody. We're
going to continue to work with them. The funds are [to be deposited]
in a Chinese bank, as Ambassador Hill said, regulated by Chinese
regulators. We expect that people will live up to their obligations.
QUESTION: What's your plan for the counterfeiting issue?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY GLASER: What's the plan for the
counterfeiting issues? Well counterfeiting issues are, I suppose,
related to this in a tangential way. I don't want to speak for the US
Secret Service, but the US Secret Service takes very seriously the
counterfeiting of the US currency. At the last bilateral working group
that we had with the North Koreans, I had two senior Secret Service
investigators with me to discuss with the North Koreans those
concerns. The Secret Service is going to continue to pursue their law
enforcement investigations, and it continues to be an issue that we're
going to raise -- because it's not acceptable for us to have our
currency counterfeited.
QUESTION: So are your dealings with the North Koreans now done or are
you going to continue your working group with the North Koreans, work
on financial issues?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY GLASER: Yes, I hope we continue the group.
I think it's important -- because resolving the Banco Delta Asia issue
was one of the purposes of the group, but it was not the only purpose
of the group. And frankly, I don't even think it was the fundamental
underlying purpose of the group. The fundamental underlying purpose of
the group was to explain to North Korea -- to try to work with North
Korea on addressing the broad range of concerns that the international
financial community has with respect to their conduct and to try to
work with them to change that conduct and to put them in a position
where they can be reintegrated into the international financial
system. We still have work to do on that, and we hope to be able to
take advantage of this group in order to continue to raise these
concerns and to continue to try to address them. (...)
QUESTION: Ambassador Hill, are you confident the North Koreans will
not raise this issue again in the Six Party Talks or in bilateral
meetings?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY HILL: As Mr. Glaser said, this was a proposal they
made, and it's a proposal we've accepted. It's a proposal that takes
into account our concerns. It's a proposal that derives from a number
of these bilateral discussions that Mr. Glaser held with the DPRK
financial officials. We feel this is the basis of the solution. We met
our 30-day requirement by announcing the rule. We then followed that
up with intense consultations, as Mr. Glaser has been doing.
And so we feel this matter has been resolved and now we can move on to
the next problem, of which there are many. And we continue to work
hard; in fact today we have our first Six-Party meeting. We're going
to evaluate all five of the working groups and evaluate how we're
doing in terms of the 60-day set of actions and then the next phase as
well. So we have a lot of work to do and we're very pleased that due
to the hard work -- and especially the hard work of the Treasury
Department by Danny Glaser and his very strong team and also the team
back in Washington with Stuart Levey and others -- we feel that we're
ready to move on.
QUESTION: Mr. Hill, with the BDA issue put aside, people are talking
about the next milestone. When do you expect the next one is coming?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY HILL: We have had some 30-day actions, and one of
them has been to resolve the BDA issue. That's been done, and I think
it's been done to mutual satisfaction. And then we've also looked at
the completion of the working groups in the 30-day time frame, and
we've been able to get that done.
And so now we're going to look at 60-day requirements. There are a
number of those. First of all, I think the DPRK has gotten off to a
good start with the IAEA, with Mr. ElBaradei's visit to Pyongyang. And
we would look forward to that process continuing in the next 30 days
so that we will have the shutdown of the Yongbyon facility, the
sealing of it, and the monitoring of it by IAEA personnel. We would
also look forward to making sure the first shipment of fuel oil --
which is called for in the February agreement -- reaches the DPRK
within the 60-day time frame. And then looking beyond for the
additional fuel oil and the additional milestones and
denuclearization, we'll need to synchronize those steps. They involve
some very important steps, including the disablement of the North
Korean nuclear program as well as the issuing of a full declaration in
return for considerable amounts of fuel oil and economic assistance. I
think we'll continue on that, and for that reason we have a lot of
work to do in the next couple of days with this meeting.
Also -- I want to emphasize the importance of this -- at the end of
the 60 days we're looking forward to having a Six-Party ministerial,
also called for in the February agreement, where Dr. Rice and all her
colleagues, including the DPRK minister, will get together and begin
to chart the course ahead.
So a lot of work to do. (...)
*************************************************
End CanKor # 277
*************************************************
PLEASE NOTE: Until we are able to update the www.CanKor.ca website,
readers are advised that this and previous issues of the CanKor Report
may be found at http://www.nautilus.org/pipermail/cankor/.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please go to the following web address:
http://www.nautilus.org/mailman/listinfo/cankor.
CanKor is a reader-supported e-publication and website. We issue a
receipt for all donations received. Contributions may be made in the
following ways:
BY CREDIT CARD: Visit our website www.CanKor.ca, and click on the
"Make a Donation" button. That will connect you to PayPal, a site with
"military-strength encryption", where you will be able to pay in
Canadian, US or Australian Dollars, as well as Euros, Pound Sterling
and Yen.
BY CHEQUE: Please make cheques payable to "Weingartner Consulting"
(NOT/not "CanKor", please) and mail to: Weingartner Consulting, 13
Westview Dr., Callander, ON, Canada, P0H 1H0.
FOR INSTITUTIONAL SUBSCRIBERS: Please let us know if you wish to
receive an invoice prior to sending us money.
CanKor is an electronic information service for readers interested in
the issues of peace and security on the Korean peninsula, published by
Weingartner Consulting. Views expressed on the CanKor website or
weekly digest are those of the respective authors, and do not
necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of CanKor or
Weingartner Consulting. CanKor accepts no liability for inaccuracies,
errors or omissions. Copyright of all items listed or reprinted rests
with the original publishers. CanKor provides links to originals when
available.
Editor: Erich Weingartner; Managing Editor: Miranda Weingartner;
Research: Marion Current, Ilene Solomon, Danielle Goldfinger; Web
developer: David Seguin. Our website (www.CanKor.ca) is hosted free of
charge courtesy of Kaizen Denki Incorporated
(http://www.kaizendenki.com).
More information about the CanKor
mailing list